The phrase "agreements should have" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the necessary components or characteristics that agreements ought to include.
Example: "In order to be effective, agreements should have clear terms and conditions that both parties understand."
Alternatives: "agreements must include" or "agreements ought to possess".
Both agreements should have broad effects, analysts and lawyers say.
"Partnership agreements should have conditions on human rights as well as social and environmental obligations attached to them.
Yesterday the supreme court ruled for the first time that prenuptial agreements should have "decisive weight" in English divorce courts.
Critical Path said some revenue from software licensing agreements should have been reported later or not at all.
Perhaps the trusts that can afford to spend money duplicating procurement agreements should have an appropriate amount of their funding taken away and transferred to fund the letting and management of procurement agreements for unregulated drugs.
In any event, the accounting office said, the agreements should have been reviewed by government lawyers because Medicare officials were "relinquishing the government's right to recover tens of millions of dollars".
Your agreement should have a start and end date – there should be no ambiguities".
The agreement, "should have no substantial impact on our business," said Max Gershenoff, a spokesman at Elan.
The Paris Agreement should have a mechanism to formally recognize the commitments and actions of non-national entities.
Some BP executives say the November agreement should have precluded the suspension by the E.P.A., although there was no formal agreement to that effect.
Given the critical role that corporations and non-national entities are playing in the climate fight, we believe that the Paris Agreement should have a mechanism to formally recognize their commitments and actions.
