The phrase "agreements are typically" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing common characteristics or norms related to agreements in various contexts, such as legal, business, or social settings.
Example: "Agreements are typically drafted to ensure clarity and mutual understanding between the parties involved."
Alternatives: "agreements are usually" or "agreements tend to be".
Settlement agreements are typically given to employees when they are being made redundant.
Credit card agreements are typically something you'd want to read only if you suffered from insomnia.
Divorce agreements are typically ironclad, but Mr. Simkin argued that Ms. Blank should be required to turn over millions of dollars she had received in the settlement to compensate him for the losses that he sustained in the Madoff fraud.
Such agreements are typically reached after expansive federal civil rights investigations, such as the probe of the Chicago police, released days before Trump took office, which determined that officers there routinely use excessive force and violate the rights of residents.
From the buyer's standpoint, these agreements are typically crafted to create post-closing alignment between the buyer and the executives, both on the downside (by requiring a rollover of significant equity and/or a cash investment) and on the upside (through promote structures and other compensation mechanisms).
Even when organizations share genomic data sets, the agreements are typically between individual institutions for individual data sets.
The DSC agreement was found to be greater than 0.7 for a majority of the images studied, where good agreement is typically defined as when agreement is greater than 60%. Figure 9: Dice coefficient between pathologist annotations for the CINJ data cohort (N = 40).
Poorer overall agreement was typically (but not always) reflected in lower Pearson correlations between self-reported and measured variables.
However, only modest agreement is typically found between the reports of different informants and the question is which informant provides the most accurate information regarding a particular child [ 2, 15].
Although inter-rater agreement is typically high for histologic diagnosis [ 23– 26], the rate of inadequate samples is a limitation of CNB as a sampling technique for breast cancer diagnosis [ 7, 8, 23, 24, 27].
The lack of unanimous agreement is typically shown in the 2 recent meta-analysis by Rizos et al. and Delgado-Lista et al., reviewing n-3 PUFAs effect on CVD including many of the same studies, but coming to opposite conclusions [ 23, 24].
