Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
Of those participants in agreement with statement 10 (n = 62), 88.7% (n = 55) also agreed with statement 8.
There is little doubt that the 7.5% (n = 5) of those participants in agreement with statement 15 (n = 67) fail to understand the relationship between population size and variation within a population as they were also in agreement with statement 17.
Among those participants in agreement with statement 10, 87.5% (n = 49) also disagreed with statement 7, producing a medium negative correlation between the two (r 73) = −0.42, P <0.01).
Agreement with statement 1 was less prevalent among those who felt that the volcano would produce long and damaging lahars (ρ(expected lahar distance) = −0.37, p < 0.01; ρ(maximum lahar distance) = −0.35, p < 0.01).
A medium negative correlation (r 74) = −0.27, P <0.05) was discovered between responses to statements 15 and 17, with 92.5% of those participants in agreement with statement 15 (n = 67) disagreeing with statement 17 (n = 62).
Of those participants in agreement with statement 11 who correctly identified that new traits appear in the population at random (n = 50), 44.0% (n = 22) agreed to the misconception that evolution is a totally random process.
Similar(48)
Prosociality is determined by the level of agreement with statements like "I am trying to help solve social problems".
Students rated their agreement with statements like "I think it is important to help other people" and "I tell the truth even when it is not easy".
The Caregiver Pain Medicine Questionnaire is designed to measure caregiver agreement with statements regarding pain management.
They scored an average of 86.8% agreement with statements measuring acceptance of biological evolution (Additional file 1: Table S1).
Table 3 Degree of agreement with statements indicating risky behavior, in relation to the frequency of speeding Statement General sample High frequency (n = 54) (avg. ± s.d).
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com