Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Answering in agreement with items in Factor 1 would indicate an individual holds common misconceptions about evolution in general.
(p < .05) Table 2 presents respondents' level of agreement with items pertaining to a culture that values, supports, and promotes various cancer-prevention items.
Patients are asked to indicate their agreement with items on a 7-point Likert-type scale, ranging from very strongly disagree to very strongly agree.
Successive questionnaire rounds are built iteratively upon the results of preceding rounds, with participants evaluating their level of agreement with items by reviewing their responses in relation to the summarised scores from the whole panel.
Similar(56)
Taking a closer look at attitudes, individuals with managerial function reported higher levels of agreements with items that generally describe the checklist as a useful tool to enhance patient safety.
Reliability of participation (Yes/No) among the list of 32 individual physical activities demonstrated the majority of items had at least substantial agreement with (4 items) having almost perfect, (19 items) substantial and (7 items) moderate agreement with (2 items) having negative agreements (Table 1).
Half these items are in agreement with the items in the Cochrane RoB tool.
Items 1, 3, 8, 9 and 10 are in agreement with the items in the Cochrane RoB tool.
With regard to consensus, in this study we were interested not only in the proportion of participants who agreed with each item, but also the proportion of participants who were uncertain about their agreement with the items.
Participants were asked to mark their agreement with the items on a Likert-type scale with four possibilities (agree completely, agree mostly, disagree mostly, and disagree completely).
Thereby the participants show highest agreement with the items representing 'self-liberation', meaning they found the course supportive for their choice and commitment to change their behaviour.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com