Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
agreement was
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"agreement was" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when expressing an agreement that has already happened in the past. Example: "The agreement was finalized last week."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Encyclopedias
Wiki
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Agreement was clearly impossible.
News & Media
No agreement was reached.
News & Media
Tabloidus: Her agreement was tacit.
News & Media
"This agreement was finished.
News & Media
The agreement was broken.
News & Media
No agreement was reached in Copenhagen.
News & Media
Even that agreement was contentious, though.
News & Media
The agreement was endorsed (Aug. 18 Sept.
Encyclopedias
But the agreement was short on details.
News & Media
After much discussion, an agreement was reached.
News & Media
Agreement was never going to be easy.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "agreement was", ensure the context clearly indicates which agreement you are referring to, especially if multiple agreements are being discussed.
Common error
Avoid using "agreement was" without specifying which agreement you are referring to, as this can lead to confusion. Provide context or a clear identifier.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "agreement was" functions as a statement of a past state. It indicates that an agreement existed or was in effect at some point in the past. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically sound for expressing past agreements.
Frequent in
News & Media
41%
Science
30%
Encyclopedias
8%
Less common in
Wiki
7%
Formal & Business
6%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "agreement was" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase to describe a past state of accord. Ludwig AI confirms its validity for expressing agreements that have already happened. It appears frequently in "News & Media" and "Science" contexts, showing its versatility across different types of writing. When using this phrase, it is important to provide sufficient context to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives include "the deal existed" or "the accord happened", depending on the desired level of formality. The phrase's widespread usage and grammatical correctness make it a reliable choice for clear and effective communication.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
the accord happened
Substitutes "agreement" with "accord", a formal synonym, and uses a simple past tense verb.
the deal existed
Replaces "agreement" with "deal" and uses a more direct verb construction.
the contract stood
Replaces agreement with contract, a formal synonym, focusing on its validity.
a consensus emerged
Focuses on the formation of a consensus rather than the state of an agreement.
there was concurrence
Replaces "agreement" with the more formal "concurrence", changing the sentence structure.
terms were settled
Highlights the settling of terms, implying an agreement.
a settlement occurred
Focuses on the occurrence of a settlement, which implies an agreement.
the parties concurred
Emphasizes the action of the parties involved agreeing, rather than the agreement itself.
understanding materialized
Highlights the development of an understanding as a form of agreement.
resolution materialized
Indicates the attainment of resolution, implying prior disagreement and subsequent agreement.
FAQs
How can I use "agreement was" in a sentence?
You can use "agreement was" to describe a state of accord that existed in the past. For example, "The agreement was signed last week".
What's the difference between "agreement was reached" and "agreement was"?
"Agreement was reached" emphasizes the act of coming to an agreement, while "agreement was" simply states the existence of an agreement at a certain point. You can also say "an agreement was made".
What can I say instead of "agreement was" to sound more formal?
To sound more formal, you could use phrases like "the accord existed", "the contract stood", or "a consensus emerged".
Is it correct to say "an agreement was"?
Yes, "an agreement was" is grammatically correct. For example, "An agreement was made between the two companies".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested