The phrase "agreement table" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to discussions, negotiations, or formal agreements where parties outline terms or conditions.
Example: "During the meeting, we will review the agreement table to ensure all parties are aligned on the terms."
Alternatives: "contract table" or "terms table".
The score on risk of bias between both reviewers showed an overall agreement of 92% and had an unweighted Kappa of 0.6 (substantial agreement) (Table 1).
This indicates excellent inter-rater agreement (Table 6).>> Table 7 shows the total arch constriction of the IO− and IO+ groups at 9 and 12 years of age.
The two sets of data were in good agreement (Table 1).
Questions categorized as 'no change expected' (0.86 0.99) and 'change unlikely' (0.68 0.99) showed a good agreement (Table 2).
However, the variability in these differences was higher than what was seen between 1TCM and 2TCM, corresponding to wider 95% limits of agreement (Table 4).
As far as the differentiation between benign and malignant STT is concerned, there is good overall agreement (Table 6) between both institutions (Cohen's kappa = 0.742).
Another surprising digression was the 250 m Wilson map that had a higher overall similarity index (FNI) than the NBC D_NCEmap and the best agreement (Table 2) with the CMS_RF map over non-forested regions.
The interrater agreement produced good results for all categories: CRQ better (k = 0.846, almost perfect agreement), CRQ fair (k = 0.700, substantial agreement) and CRQ worse (k = 0.797, substantial agreement) (Table 4).
The methods (M = 1.67 ± 0.77) and the other participants (M = 1.67 ± 0.70) are considered to be of least importance, but still gain relatively high scores for agreement (Table 4).
Inter-rater agreement (Table 2) varied across RoB domains.
Consistent with the latter, we found 3 genes disagreeing; however we found 11 genes in agreement (Table 1), which is significantly (p = 10−6) greater than the 2.1 expected.
