Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(7)
As a cornerstone of any Paris agreement, poor countries want assurances that this pledge will be met.
The corresponding κ-coefficient was 0.19 and strengths of agreement poor (Table 2).
Morphological response assessment by CT, using RECIST 1.0, and metabolic response assessment by FDG-PET/CT, using PERCIST, were incongruent and agreement poor.
Visual rating of GCA seems harder to perform reliably between different raters, while despite moderate to good intra-rater agreement, poor inter-rater agreement has been reported [ 35].
The kappa values for agreement were interpreted according to the scale by Landis and Koch [ 13]: agreement poor < 0; slight 0.00-0.20; fair 0.21-0.40; moderate 0.41-0.60; substantial 0.61-0.80; almost perfect 0.81-1.00).
[ 19] To interpret the estimated kappa values, we used the classification suggested by Landis and Koch, indicating the strength of agreement: poor (kappa < 0.00), slight (kappa 0.00 0.20), fair (0.21 0.40), moderate (0.41 0.60), substantial (0.61 0.80), and almost perfect (0.81 1.00).
Similar(53)
Inter-observer agreement was poor, mostly for RFCSA.
When vapor-density effects were ignored, agreement was poor.
Qualitatively the Eh profiles show similarities, but quantitatively, agreement is poor.
Correlation and agreement were poor for peripheral sites of measurement (skin and tympanic) [176 180].
The agreement is poor when the contact profile of the indenter was idealized as flat.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com