agreement opened

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "agreement opened" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to describe the initiation or commencement of an agreement, but it lacks clarity and proper context. Example: "The agreement opened for discussion during the meeting, allowing all parties to voice their concerns."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

14 human-written examples

For Mr. Clarke, the Patriot agreement opened the door to other deals.

The New York Times

A year later, the players union, in a new collective bargaining agreement, opened the door to testing in the majors.

The New York Times - Sports

This agreement opened the way for the formation of a government of national unity that could open peace negotiations.

The Guardian - Opinion

Philippe van Damme, the EU ambassador to Zimbabwe, said during a signing ceremony that the agreement opened a new chapter in Europe's relationship with the country.

The Guardian

The December 17th agreement opened a chink in the trade blockade: it allowed more Americans to visit Cuba without special permits, enabled them to spend more money there and to send more remittances.

The Economist

Addressing the Greek nation, the prime minister, Antonis Samaras, said the landmark agreement opened the way to the country's "rebirth" after one of the darkest periods in its modern history.

The Guardian - Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

44 human-written examples

For Taiwan, the agreement opens the door for producers to make panels there and sell into the European market at an even lower price, analysts said.

The New York Times

But Cooper claims Apollo has breached the terms of the merger agreement, opening the door for it to sue Apollo for damages.

The New York Times

Experts said eight deals have been signed between American and Russian companies since last year in preparation for the enactment of the cooperation agreement opening the door to collaboration.

The New York Times

Violeta Bulc, European commissioner for transport, said: "This unprecedented agreement opens a new chapter in international aviation, where sustainability finally becomes part of the way we fly.

The Guardian

The N.B.A.'s new collective bargaining agreement opens the door to blood testing for human growth hormone — provided that the league and the players union can agree on the reliability of the test.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "agreement opened". Opt for clearer and grammatically sound alternatives like "agreement was signed" or "agreement took effect".

Common error

Do not use "opened" to describe an agreement becoming active. "Opened" typically refers to physical objects or abstract concepts like discussions, not formal documents or contracts.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "agreement opened" functions as a subject-verb combination, where "agreement" is the subject and "opened" is the verb. However, the verb is used incorrectly, as agreements are not typically described as "opening". As per Ludwig AI analysis, this usage is not correct.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

66%

Science

21%

Formal & Business

13%

Less common in

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "agreement opened" appears with relative frequency, Ludwig AI indicates that it's grammatically incorrect. It's better to use alternatives such as "agreement was signed", "agreement took effect", or "agreement was implemented" to convey the intended meaning of an agreement becoming active or effective. Despite appearing in various sources, including news outlets, it’s crucial to opt for grammatically sound and precise language to ensure clarity in writing. Although common, remember that correct grammar enhances the credibility and readability of your content.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

agreement was signed

This alternative is a more grammatically correct way to describe the establishment of an agreement.

agreement took effect

This alternative specifies that the agreement has become operational or valid.

agreement was implemented

This alternative focuses on the action of putting the agreement into practice.

agreement came into force

This alternative is a formal way of saying the agreement became legally binding.

agreement began

This is a simple alternative focusing on the start of the agreement's duration.

agreement initiated

This suggests the agreement process was started or commenced.

agreement established

This alternative highlights the creation or setting up of the agreement.

agreement finalized

This suggests the end of the negotiation/approval process and confirms that the agreement has been completely ratified.

agreement was ratified

This alternative states the agreement was formally approved and confirmed.

agreement was concluded

This alternative focuses on finishing the agreement, often used in formal contexts.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to the phrase "agreement opened"?

Instead of "agreement opened", consider using phrases such as "agreement was signed", "agreement took effect", or "agreement was implemented" depending on the specific context.

Why is "agreement opened" considered grammatically questionable?

The verb "opened" typically applies to physical objects or abstract concepts like a discussion, not to legal or formal documents. Using "agreement opened" sounds awkward and lacks precision. More appropriate verbs would be "signed", "ratified", or "implemented".

How can I use "agreement" correctly in a sentence about it becoming effective?

To correctly describe an agreement becoming effective, you might say "The "agreement came into force"" or "The agreement was signed and "took effect" immediately."

What's the difference between saying an "agreement opened" and an "agreement was signed"?

Saying an "agreement opened" is grammatically incorrect and lacks clarity. Saying an "agreement was signed" is a clear and correct way to state that an agreement has been formally executed by the involved parties.