Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
To compare the interthreshold and intrathreshold strategy agreement of visual field end point criteria for standard automated perimetry (SAP) with the full-threshold (FT) algorithm and the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm (SITA).
The secondary objectives were: to assess the intraobserver agreement of visual blood estimates and the rate of underestimation of blood loss by participants, and to estimate the sensitivity, specificity, and negative likelihood ratio of these estimates for clinically pertinent blood losses (≥ 500 mL and ≥ 1000 mL).
The initial clinical results indicate agreement of visual field measurements taken by the VisualEye head-mounted perimeter in both manual and visual grasp modes and the HFA test.
As expected, visual and automated determinations of Ki-67 LI were strongly correlated (ρ=0.87, r=0.94, Figure 3) with good agreement of visual and automated Ki-67 status using the cutoff described (ICCC=0.96, P<0.001).
Similar(55)
We found that agreement on visual assessment of PA varied between good and excellent.
Inter-observer agreement studies of visual acuity (VA) testing were performed during pilot studies undertaken in each of the six geopolitical zones (GPZ), which are the main administrative divisions in the country.
Inter-observer agreement of the visual analysis was k = 0.46 (p < 0.01) for planar scintigraphy and k = 0.35 (p < 0.01) for SPECT/CT (Table 7).
In this study, we compared agreement of the visual evaluation of both planar scintigraphy and SPECT/CT with the quantitation of local tracer uptake in longitudinal bone scans of patients with osseus metastases.
Inter-rater agreement of the visual assessments was estimated by calculating Cohen's kappa and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI).
We observed diminished SIFI in episodic migraine patients, especially in those with aura (MA) and during the attack[3] in agreement with the hypothesis of visual cortex hyperexcitability.
The combined suitability estimates showed a very high degree of visual agreement with the outbreaks reported to the OIE.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com