Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "agreement grade" is not a standard expression in written English, and its meaning may not be clear without context.
You might use it in contexts related to evaluating or assessing the level of agreement in a survey or study.
Example: "The agreement grade for the participants' responses was surprisingly high, indicating a strong consensus on the issue."
Alternatives: "level of agreement" or "consensus rating."
Exact(1)
Agreement grade was defined as <0.2 for poor, 0.2 0.4 for moderate, 0.4 0.6 for fair, 0.6 0.8 for good and 0.8 1.0 for excellent.
Similar(59)
There was agreement between grade assigned by Ki-67 and grade assigned by MC in 74 of 131 (56%) pancreatic NENs; and in 84 of 136 (62%) of midgut NENs (Table 4).
We therefore investigated the agreement between grade according to Ki-67 index and grade according to MC in midgut and pancreatic NENs.
Possible values of sj therefore range from 0 to 1, with a value of 1 indicating that there was unilateral agreement on grade for every sample, and a value of 0 indicating that a particular rater did not give the same grade as any other rater for any sample.
The classification k for agreement on grade 3 PGD was 0.93.
We measured the chance-corrected agreement on grade between groups using the Kappa test.
When surgical and biopsy specimens were compared for agreement between grade using Ki-67 and MC, there was little difference with κW 0.42 (0.26–0.59) and κW 0.39 (0.29–0.49), respectively.
Our findings conflict with findings by Strosberg et al (2009), who demonstrated complete agreement between grade by Ki-67 and MC.
These three groups were compared for radiological and pathological size agreement, DCIS grade and whether specimen slice radiography had been carried out.
For CTA of carotids, stenosis grading based on visual estimation provides better agreement to grading by DSA compared with stenosis grading based on caliper measurements.
Interrater agreement in grading of overall and mouth bleeding and epistaxis was acceptable.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com