Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
The overall inter-rater agreement for evaluation of cerebral imaging was similarly high for FLAIR status (0.76) as for secondary hemorrhage (0.75).
The strength of the combined inter-observer agreement for evaluation of the SIJ changes ranged from moderate (κ = .52) to almost perfect agreement (κ = .81) (Table 6).
While the benefits of SPECT/CT have not been universally accepted [ 74, 75], both planar and SPECT images demonstrate good or excellent inter- and intraobserver agreement for evaluation of SLNs, with kappa values of 68 89% [ 43].
69 While the benefits of SPECT/CT have not been universally accepted, both planar and SPECT images demonstrate good or excellent inter- and intraobserver agreement for evaluation of SLNs, with kappa values of 68 89%.
Similar(55)
Conclusion The most robust agreement results for evaluation of treatment response were achieved using a volume change threshold ≥35%.
The interobserver agreement for the evaluation of the hydrops in Meniere disease patients was good (ICC 0.69 on the right side and 0.84 on the left) and the intraobserver agreement was good with an ICC of 0.87.
Thus agreement for muscular evaluation was verified for PTs that identified the same specific posture alteration.
Regarding global assessment, one recent study investigated the inter-observer agreement for global evaluation of MRI of the SIJ in SpA versus non-SpA patients.
The inter- and intra-observer agreement for the evaluation of spondyloarthritis-related and degenerative MRI changes in the spine and spondyloarthritis-related changes in the sacroiliac joints were investigated in this study.
The acceptable agreement for the evaluation of key MRI changes in the spine and SIJ makes it possible to use these MRI changes in the BaPa Cohort study and other studies investigating MRI changes in patients with non-specific LBP and suspected SpA.
Complete agreement for both evaluations among the four readers was achieved in 95.5% of repairs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com