The aim of this study was to elucidate how the participants perceived a multi-professional intervention consisting of self-assessment, peer review, feedback and agreement for change.
A content analysis using a priori coding was performed in order to relate results to the anticipated outcomes of three basic interventions: self-assessment, peer review and written feedback, and agreement for change.
Our purpose was to study a national intervention programme for the prevention of birth injuries with the aim to elucidate how the main interventions of self-assessment, peer review, feedback and written agreement for change affected the teams and their mental model of patient safety, and thereby their readiness for change.
If deficits or surpluses persisted, the agreement provided for changes in exchange rates.
The DOJ agreement called for changes to the department's policies on use of force, training and transparency, as well ongoing review by civilian panels and an independent monitor.
US and MRI were more sensitive to inflammatory and destructive changes than x-ray and clinical examination, and US showed a high interobserver agreement for bone changes and a lower interobserver agreement for inflammatory changes.
The SÄKLÄK project is a multi-professional intervention in primary care consisting of self-assessment, peer review, feedback and written agreements for change.
However, due to an unexpected delay in providing written feedback to some units a few of the interviews were performed before the agreements for change had been signed.
US and MRI were more sensitive to inflammatory and destructive changes than x-ray and clinical examination, and US showed a good interobserver agreement for bone changes (median 96% absolute agreement) and lower interobserver agreement for inflammatory changes (median 92% absolute agreement).
