Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
In all cases, the agreement degree was beyond 0.8.
The agreement degree P with the second subject (S_2) was 0.829.
The agreement degree P with the first subject (S_1) was 0.875.
The agreement degree P with the third subject (S_3) was 0.840.
Overall, the average of the agreement degree between the subjects was 0.83.
Table 3 shows the agreement degree P based on gestalt factors used to evaluate the interobject relations.
Similar(52)
We demonstrate that the fit is significantly higher for mesophilic than for thermophilic proteins with respect to GDD-agreement, degree distribution, and clustering coefficient (Table S1).
Specifically, as protein size increases, the fit also noticeably increases with respect to GDD-agreement and degree-distribution.
This is in good agreement with high degree of paramagnetism found during NMR experiments.
Comparison with experimental data shows good agreement and high degree of predictability.
Both the weakness of the agreement and the degree to which it was celebrated show us that in the narrative battle, progressive movements remain fragmented.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com