The phrase "agreement competition" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts discussing competitive agreements or contests related to agreements, but clarity is essential.
Example: "The agreement competition among the firms led to innovative partnerships that benefited all parties involved."
Alternatives: "contract competition" or "consensus contest".
By means of such agreement, competition as to interstate rates from St. Paul on excelsior and tow was eliminated, uniform rates were established, and interstate commerce was restrained.
These exist mostly among broadcasters and among the football clubs and associations, as tensions between broadcasters and clubs can usually be resolved, because they can usually come to a mutually beneficial agreement: –Competition.
It used to be that Phil Jones would champion his datasets over all others, being particularly critical of GISS, this no longer happens, it appears to be of more import that they are all in agreement, competition sits better with my experience of the real world.
Companies applied protection mechanisms to secure crucial information, including formal mechanisms like intellectual property management, and semi-formal such as confidentiality agreements (competition).
promote increased discipline in selecting and using procurement contracts, grant agreements, and cooperative agreements, maximize competition in making procurement contracts, and encourage competition in making grants and cooperative agreements.
Some have questioned the impact of the agreement on competition, suggesting it will limit consumer choice and hand Google a monopoly.
Schering-Plough and Upsher-Smith said that the $60 million was paid to settle patent-infringement lawsuits and that there was no proof the agreement delayed competition by generic drugs.
Yet regardless of one's view of the 1940 transaction, the fact remains that if the parties had not renewed their agreement, full competition between the two newspapers would have been restored in 1965 and the Justice Department would never have begun the Sherman Act branch of this lawsuit.
It forces the states to protect specific tobacco companies that signed the agreement from competition by requiring states to pass laws restricting sales by non-participating tobacco companies.
