The phrase "agreed upon classification" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a classification system or categorization that has been accepted by a group or individuals.
Example: "The researchers presented their findings based on the agreed upon classification of species in the study."
Alternatives: "consensus classification" or "accepted classification".
In particular, the place of apperception in the three-fold classifications given just above of three kinds of perceptions and of simple substances is not agreed upon, despite the fact that this would seem to be of considerable importance.
Although no agreed-upon classification system exists so far [ 14], it has to be acknowledged that this category comprises a heterogeneous group of CIs such as pressure sores, handling of specimens, infection control, and airway management.
Table 4 describes the classifications by the two experienced reviewers of the 45 control charts considered and the final agreed-upon classification of control charts for each facility and its units.
The lack of widely agreed-upon classification systems for critical incident types can hamper comparisons with other studies.
There is no currently agreed upon international classification system for fistula, and practitioners have issued a call for an evidence-based approach to developing a system.
One of the main measurements proposed to assess diastolic function is tissue velocity E (E′), and cut-off values have been agreed upon for classification of diastolic function using in particular the E/E′ ratio.
Articles in disagreement were discussed using consensus until both reviewers agreed upon the classifications.
We are not claiming that our training sets are free of questions of overlapped types because they would still exist even if authors 1 and 2 agreed upon a single classification for these.
Even though the concept of food grouping seems to be internationally agreed upon, the actual classification of food has been shown to be highly culturally dependent and most national databases have unique examples.
Urials show such genetic variation, both within and between populations, that it is hard for taxonomists to agree upon their classification.
When the agreement was not initially achieved, differences were discussed and the final code was agreed upon with a common classification.
