agreed to split

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "agreed to split" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a mutual decision to divide something, such as costs, responsibilities, or resources. Example: "After much discussion, we all agreed to split the expenses for the trip evenly."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

We finally agreed to split up.

The New York Times - Travel

They agreed to split their considerable wealth equally.

The New York Times

We agreed to split the cost of a vacation.

The New York Times - Magazine

When the check came, we agreed to split it.

The New York Times

She agreed to split the commission from AzoogleAds with him.

The New York Times

You agreed to split these costs, and that's what you did.

The New York Times - Magazine

In 2004, Democratic members agreed to split the investigation of Iraq intelligence.

The New York Times

Some time after midnight, EU leaders agreed to split the difference.

The Guardian

Mr. Carlo said he never agreed to split profits with the mobster and was not intimidated.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

The band have 'mutually agreed to split', their statement said, but gave no reasons.

The Guardian

After his repeated prodding, Motorola agreed to split itself into two divisions, one that makes handsets and one that manufactures enterprise equipment.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "agreed to split", ensure clarity regarding what is being split and among whom. This prevents ambiguity and ensures the intended meaning is effectively conveyed.

Common error

Avoid using "agreed to split" without specifying what is being divided or among whom. For example, instead of saying "They agreed to split", clarify with "They agreed to split the profits equally".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "agreed to split" functions as a verb phrase indicating a mutual decision or consensus to divide or share something. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in various contexts. It emphasizes the act of reaching an agreement on how to distribute resources, responsibilities, or costs.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

85%

Formal & Business

10%

Science

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

0%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "agreed to split" is a common and grammatically correct verb phrase that signifies a mutual decision to divide something. Ludwig AI's analysis reveals that this phrase is most frequently found in news and media contexts, but also has applications in formal business settings. To ensure clarity, it is important to specify what is being split and among whom. Alternatives such as "decided to share" or "consented to divide" can be used depending on the level of formality required. The phrase's widespread usage and clear meaning make it a reliable choice for conveying shared decisions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

consented to divide

Emphasizes formal agreement and separation into distinct parts.

decided to share

Highlights the mutual decision to partake in something jointly.

came to an understanding to apportion

Focuses on reaching a mutual comprehension and allocating specific shares.

reached a consensus to allocate

Stresses the collective agreement to distribute resources systematically.

mutually decided to partition

Highlights a joint decision to divide something into segments.

collectively opted to distribute

Emphasizes a group choice in handing out resources among members.

settled on dividing

Suggests resolution after discussion, with a focus on the division itself.

determined to allocate portions

Highlights the clear decision to assign specific amounts to different entities.

resolved to share equitably

Focuses on achieving a fair division of something among parties.

struck a deal to apportion

Indicates a formal agreement to allocate something based on a negotiated arrangement.

FAQs

How do I use "agreed to split" in a sentence?

You can use "agreed to split" to indicate a mutual decision to divide something, such as "The partners agreed to split the costs" or "The board agreed to split the company into two divisions".

What can I say instead of "agreed to split"?

You can use alternatives like "decided to share", "consented to divide", or "settled on dividing" depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "agreed to splitting"?

While "agreed to split" is the more common and grammatically straightforward construction, "agreed to splitting" can be used but is less conventional. "Agreed to split" is generally preferred for clarity.

What's the difference between "agreed to split" and "agreed to divide"?

While both phrases convey the idea of distributing something, "agreed to split" often implies a more equal or informal distribution, whereas "agreed to divide" can suggest a more structured or formal apportionment.