The phrase "agreed implications" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the consequences or outcomes that have been mutually accepted or acknowledged by parties involved in a discussion or agreement.
Example: "The agreed implications of the contract were clearly outlined in the final document, ensuring that both parties understood their responsibilities."
Alternatives: "mutually accepted consequences" or "consensus on implications".
More extensive simulations agreed with the implication of Remark 1 that the CS-based cryptosystem will have lower TV distances with less PNR, M, and K.
When the investigator was satisfied that the respondent understood it including its implications, and agreed to participate, only then she was selected for the in-depth interview.
Another possible implication, Bolton agreed, was that fashion is trash.
International standard-setting bodies have recognized this implication and agreed that "as a minimum set of measurements—size, zeta potential (surface charge), and solubility" of nanoparticles should be used as predictors of nanoparticle toxicity (74).
The peer-to-peer car-sharing industry is still in its infancy, and insurance companies don't actually agree on its implications for your own policy if you are lending out your car, something I addressed in a column last month.
And at the White House, senior officials receive several status reports a week on a process that all sides agree has vast implications for the country as a whole and for the Obama administration's political fortunes.
He said the movie made him cry three times, that compared to everything else that's ever been written about him or made about him it is by far the most humane portrait, whether or not he agrees with the implications about his guilt.
We agree that the implications of nutrient deprivation can be complex and therefore we have been cautious not to overinterpret the findings based on these experiments.
Author's response: Kondrashov's position is that professional scientists already agree on the implications of selection, mutation and drift, and have no need of the kind of "discussions of basic principles" found in my article.
Against Strawson ("Replies" 1979) he noted that there was considerable agreement between them: in particular, they both agreed that perceptual judgments contain implications going beyond those carried by a 'strict' account of our sensible experience.
