The phrase "agree on the value" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing consensus or mutual understanding regarding a specific value or amount in various contexts, such as business negotiations or collaborative projects.
Example: "Before we proceed with the contract, we need to agree on the value of the services provided."
Alternatives: "reach a consensus on the value" or "settle on the value".
"Then they agree on the value of all the property.
They could all agree on the value of that.
We can all agree on the value of reuse, repurposing, recycling, upcycling.
Do the various reviewers agree on the value or attributes of the book or has it aroused controversy among the critics?
This is the second time in recent weeks that AremisSoft and its customers have failed to agree on the value of their contracts.
Democratic and Republican speechwriters may differ on the content of the speeches, but we agree on the value of the writing.
In New York, the state's new evaluation system would use similar measures to calculate at least 20 percent of a teacher's score; it took more than a year of fighting in court and at the negotiating table for state officials and union leaders to agree on the value-added weight.
Both the vagueness of prior plausibility ratio values for individual agents and the diversity of values among the community of agents can be represented formally by sets of probabilistic support functions, {Pα, Pβ, …}, that agree on the values for the likelihoods but encompass a range of values for the (ratios of) prior probabilities of hypotheses.
Given that a scientific community should largely agree on the values of the likelihoods, any significant disagreement among them with regard to the values of posterior probabilities of hypotheses should derive from disagreements over their assessments of values for the prior probabilities of those hypotheses.
Since we have assumed that primal and dual subproblems are reciprocal in the sense that they agree on the values of the dual variables λ ̂ j k and λ j k when y j k = ŷ j k (see Section 3.1, step 3), a consequence is that λ ̆ j k ( y j ∗ ) computed in (13) equals λ j ∗ = μ ∗ as well as y j k = y j ∗ in (10).
The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute in the United States and the European Union Commission do not agree on the values of MICs or disk diffusion zone size break points for antibacterial drugs, and the introduction of molecular techniques may further complicate comparisons.
