Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "agree on scoring" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing consensus or mutual understanding regarding a scoring system or criteria, often in contexts like sports, assessments, or evaluations.
Example: "Before the tournament begins, we need to agree on scoring to ensure fairness among all teams."
Alternatives: "reach a consensus on scoring" or "come to an agreement on scoring".
Exact(1)
To agree on scoring, researchers discussed differences in judgement on the appropriate size of documents, the usefulness of diagrams and how to define the criteria for scoring referenced statements and contact details for help.
Similar(59)
Although both raters had previous experience and agreed on scoring conventions, many instances were more difficult to score than one might imagine.
The chemists seem to agree on scores for very simple and very complex molecules better than for structures in the middle region (as mentioned already in [9]).
Three studies agreed on scoring signals in at least 100 neoplastic interphase nuclei per tumour [ 32, 38, 39].
Therefore, we believe that the potential use of this predictive biomarker in ccRCC should be further explored after agreeing on scoring technique, cut-off threshold for deletion and the number of cores required, keeping in mind intratumour heterogeneity.
Previously they did a scoring pilot test with ten tests to agree on the scoring methodology.
This involved (1) looking at the scores themselves to identify which items were more likely to be questioned, give rise to uncertainty or require a group discussion to agree on a score and which were not and (2) exploring when the two forms of scoring occurred within the MDT meetings depending on the contextual factors identified within the interviews.
When the two researchers did not agree on the score, they re-evaluated the section together until an agreement could be reached.
During 'unproblematic' scoring, the scores were simply reported by team members and it was tacitly assumed that there was no need for a discussion amongst team members to agree on a score.
An interesting finding was that the variance (i.e. spread) of patient ratings appeared to be dependent upon the score given, such that patients tended to agree on high empathy scores more than on low empathy scores [ 18].
Final revisions will be made and we will agree on a single scoring pattern.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com