The phrase "agnostic relationship" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to describe a relationship that is neutral or not committed to a specific belief or system, often in technical or philosophical discussions.
Example: "The software was designed to maintain an agnostic relationship with various data sources, allowing for flexibility in integration."
Alternatives: "neutral relationship" or "indifferent relationship".
Incorporating standard deviation (SD) of monthly mean temperature and latitude increases the accuracy of prediction (R2 > .99), demonstrating the strength of the location-agnostic relationship in predicting degree-days from two temperature parameters: annual mean and SD of monthly mean.
Of course, you can live in a relationship where one partner is agnostic and the other a believer.
What we are doing with the "as", therefore, is signalling that we are agnostic on the exact nature of the relationships between the two interpretations of the TOL.
An individual that has an avoidant attachment will have atheist or agnostic tendencies, and has a distant and inaccessible relationship with God.
The Vatican is planning a new initiative to reach out to atheists and agnostics in an attempt to improve the church's relationship with non-believers.
Another potential criticism is that the approach only addresses variable relationships relevant to the effect of interest, remaining agnostic about other regions of the DAG.
As discussed in "The temporal causal network model" section, an avoidant attachment relationship can possibly lead to an individual with atheist or agnostic tendencies, and a distant relationship to God.
Because of the Zipdrug's pharmacy-agnostic approach, users can keep their existing pharmacy and still maintain a relationship with their current pharmacist.
And yet, the majority of community leaders and Americans--Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Sikh, Secular Humanist, Atheist, Agnostic, Zoroastrian--with whom I learn and work value diversity and prioritize listening and relationship over debate and derision.
Here, the conversations are led by students, not religious scholars; they intentionally include agnostics and atheists; and they are not focused on religious teachings per se but rather students' relationship to their faith or their philosophical beliefs.
