Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "aggrieved person" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in legal contexts to refer to someone who has been wronged or harmed in some way, often in relation to a legal claim or grievance.
Example: "The aggrieved person filed a complaint against the company for unfair treatment."
Alternatives: "wronged individual" or "injured party".
Exact(36)
Defendant contended, and the intermediate appellate court agreed, that an individual must have sustained some actual injury or harm, apart from the statutory violation itself, in order to have standing to sue under the Act as an "aggrieved" person.
"Aggrieved person" means a person who is the target of an electronic surveillance or any other person whose communications or activities were subject to electronic surveillance.
On the facts, personal liberty extended to the liberty of an aggrieved person to go to court and seek judicial review, and thus a statutory provision that sought to oust the power of judicial review was apparently inconsistent with this fundamental liberty.
Apologizing isn't just for the aggrieved person; it's for yourself.
Any relief so granted that would accrue to an aggrieved person in a civil action commenced by that aggrieved person under section 3613 of this title shall also accrue to that aggrieved person in a civil action under this subsection.
Any aggrieved person may intervene as a party in the proceeding.
Similar(24)
The Assistant Regional Administrator for HUD wrote petitioners' counsel on November 5, 1970, that 'it is the determination of this office that the complainants are aggrieved persons and as such are within the jurisdiction' of the Act.
Aggrieved persons who cannot avail themselves of the protection afforded by Article 12(2) may try to argue that they are a member of a group defined by a law in a way that violates Article 12(12.
Any person aggrieved by any act of a person in violation of this section may bring a civil action in a United States district court.
961, 966, 22 L.Ed.2d 176, and a person aggrieved by an illegal search and seizure only through the introduction of damaging evidence secured by a search of a third person's premises or property has not had any of his Fourth Amendment rights infringed.
(2) By any other person aggrieved or whose interests are adversely affected by any decision of the Commission granting or refusing any such application.' 48 Stat.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com