The phrase "aggrieved parties" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in legal contexts to refer to individuals or groups who have suffered harm or injury and are seeking redress.
Example: "The aggrieved parties filed a lawsuit against the company for breach of contract."
Alternatives: "injured parties" or "affected parties."
Aggrieved parties should seek appellate court review.
Aggrieved parties may pursue a legislative remedy through a claims bill for payment in full, Fla .Stat.
But it strengthens a defendant's position in a number of ways, making it harder for aggrieved parties to sue and easier for people being sued to defend themselves.
But they did create a unifying intellectual framework that regulators, aggrieved parties, and the companies themselves can draw on in thinking through the relevant issues.
Sunstein thinks some deterrence is necessary and, as you'd expect, he favours legal means, for example, giving aggrieved parties the right to demand a retraction once a statement has been shown to be false.
It's also a reminder that real people can get hurt by a newspaper's missteps, and maybe I was made to suffer that review so I could empathize with similarly aggrieved parties two decades later.
Moreover, by the decision of the legislature to permit aggrieved parties six instead of four years to prosecute their claims, a decision contrary to the recommended period by drafters of the Uniform Commercial Code which was ultimately adopted in Pennsylvania, the legislature determined that the interests of Wisconsin are best advanced by a longer period.
In Doe, the Supreme Court essentially repudiated that part of its decision in Falvo that allowed a private claim to proceed, ruling that FERPA's nondisclosure provisions do not permit aggrieved parties to file suits against institutions in disputes over access to, or impermissible release of, their educational records.
This is an unusual step in the French system, where most aggrieved parties are content with the damages awarded by the civil courts.
Under the Costa contract, if a cruise does not touch U.S. soil as this one didn't–aggrieved parties can only sue in Genoa, Italy.
We should have had two penalties and a red card for them," said Tan. "I believe VAR needs to be implemented so that human errors can be avoided and aggrieved parties won't be fined for their rightful rant and unhappiness which is costly to a club like Cardiff fighting relegation". Match Of The Day 2: Do decisions even themselves out?
