The phrase "aggressively deal" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where one intends to confront or address an issue with determination and forcefulness.
Example: "The management decided to aggressively deal with the ongoing issues of employee dissatisfaction to improve morale."
Alternatives: "tackle head-on" or "address forcefully".
Keynes believed that the government had to aggressively deal with each crisis as it happened by filling in the gap left by the private sector.
"If Broadway is really put on long-term ice and he is seen as having failed to aggressively deal with this, there could be some political pressure," said Joshua B. Freeman, a labor historian at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York.
But they also don't want to fuck with that, because anything they do to really aggressively deal with the affordable housing issue will cause a financial disaster.
We heard Bush promise every year in his State of the Union address that he would aggressively deal with global warming issues.
Currently, said Mr. Kalikow, the agency is "aggressively dealing" with insurance and federal officials.
"Through our rigorous ethical standards program, Wal-Mart aggressively deals with any allegations of improper conditions at our suppliers' factories," a company spokesman said.
However, feed costs have come down and companies have aggressively dealt with the issue of oversupply.
He recommended offering "a bounty for the capture of those responsible," and "aggressively dealing with the problem directly".
Yes, Hollywood is now aggressively dealing with the fact that Hollywood (the birthplace and generic name for all entertainment on film) may now be Hollywood in name only.
Lewis said the Progressive Policy Institute supports net neutrality legislation "that confirms the open internet and aggressively deals with paid prioritization, beyond what any ISP likely would want".
"Unless the Police Department aggressively deals with its culture of impunity and trains officers that they must simultaneously protect both safety and individual rights, officers will continue to believe that they can act without consequence".
