The phrase "aggressive regimes" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe governments or political systems that are hostile, militaristic, or oppressive in nature.
Example: "The international community must take a stand against aggressive regimes that threaten global stability."
Alternatives: "hostile governments" or "militant states".
He's speaking broadly, generically, in favor of security council intervention against "aggressive regimes" and "perpetrators of brutal action".
It will decide guidelines for when a boycott is justified, so that it is applied fairly to all countries in the world with aggressive regimes.
Right through the Cold War, the West faced aggressive regimes which we alternately sought to treat with or confront, neither course having much effect.
SANCTIONS are the worst of policy instruments, except for the alternatives: all-out war, or doing nothing at all about cruel and aggressive regimes.
On one hand, that's a victory for truth over the lies of aggressive regimes, which can't marshal blind public support for bogus, imperial wars like they used to.
The statement, distributed by the state news agency, added: "Iraq announces the withdrawal of its recognition of the Libyan regime as a member of the Arab League". It cited "the alliance between the two aggressive regimes (of Libya and Iran) against Iraq" as its reason for breaking with the Libyan government, headed by Moammar Kadafi.
"Iran is still a completely unreformed, highly aggressive regime.
Today we have the greater power to free a nation by breaking a dangerous and aggressive regime".
Today, we have the greater power to free a nation by breaking a dangerous and aggressive regime.
Unable to commit itself to either aggressive regime change or a program of reconstruction and reconciliation, the U.S. government hasn't made any progress on either approach.
The threat posed to international peace and security, when WMD are in the hands of a brutal and aggressive regime like Saddam's, is real.
