The phrase "aggressive interpretation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where someone is analyzing or interpreting something in a forceful or assertive manner, often implying a strong or confrontational stance.
Example: "The lawyer's aggressive interpretation of the contract led to a heated debate during the negotiations."
Alternatives: "forceful interpretation" or "assertive interpretation".
However, such an aggressive interpretation of fuzzy clustering results to a crisp partition of inferior quality.
The boundary detectors constructed by an aggressive interpretation are allowed to cover a part of self region.
He had already served a term in prison, he said, where he found many converts to his aggressive interpretation of Islamic faith.
He and the artists fancied themselves a kind of gang — part Cedar Tavern, part "Sopranos" — an aggressive interpretation of the old bohemian cliché.
In addition, the partition is smoothly transferred from fuzzy to crisp conditions and there is no need to employ any aggressive interpretation of fuzzy clustering.
But many Sunni leaders and militants here in northern Lebanon offered a more aggressive interpretation of the Samaha case and the kidnappings.
Frustrated by federal policies like the bank bailout and rules allowing wolves to prowl the West, they drafted so-called sovereignty resolutions, aggressive interpretations of states' rights outlined in the Tenth Amendment.
The least aggressive interpretations — Mr. Stritch's elegant, wistful performances of "It Amazes Me" and "Some Kind of Music," for instance — came as a needed balm amid the general brassiness of much of the rest.
Never mind that they are counseling clients or structuring transactions, not acting as advocates -- they believe themselves to be ethically permitted to rely on strained, distorted, and implausible (or, stated more positively, creative and aggressive) interpretations of law to advance their clients' ends.
While it remains unclear whether the memorandum ever reached a final form, the tone and breadth of it reflected the sweep of Mr. Gonzales's legal thinking and what appears to be his willingness to adopt highly aggressive interpretations of the law in the fight against terrorism.
In yet another policy arena, overly aggressive interpretations of the Freedom of Information Act also may inhibit certain private information sharing.
