The phrase "aggressive individuals" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe people who exhibit aggressive behavior or attitudes in various contexts, such as psychology, social interactions, or conflict situations.
Example: "In the study, researchers found that aggressive individuals were more likely to engage in confrontational behavior during discussions."
Alternatives: "hostile people" or "belligerent individuals".
The cognitive distortions would facilitate aggression and provide aggressive individuals with justifications for their behavior, thereby contributing to its ongoing use (e.g., Barriga and Gibbs 1996).
However, some studies have failed to detect hypoactive PFC responses in aggressive individuals (22), suggesting that PFC abnormalities in aggression may be more complex than simple hypoactivity (25); for instance, connectivity between PFC and subcortical regions may be impaired.
Additionally, this research has shown that within-clique aggression may be socially rewarded by affording high status to certain aggressive individuals, especially [End Page 432] when they have sufficient social prowess to offset their aggression with prosocial behaviors.
As an online moderator, I've spent years dealing with abusive, disruptive and aggressive individuals.
Aggressive individuals have ritualized many of these intention movements into signals when both parties benefit by avoiding costly fights.
He chopped off the heads of 100 aggressive individuals, ground them up and ran a test to measure changes in the activity of their brain genes.
In the case of aggressiveness, the benefit to the aggressive individual is, paradoxically, that he will not have to get into fights in order to prove the point.
"I think Mitt Romney's a very aggressive individual.
"Being the aggressive individual that I am, I made a few calls, including one to my contacts in Tokyo, and eventually got myself rehired," he recalled.
"Nonetheless, the backdrop and underlying problem from a regulator's perspective is that banking has become a global business, a development hindering aggressive individual country action.
Gingrich was a far more volatile and aggressive individual than Boehner, but the institutional norms of self-restraint, and perhaps even self-interest, have broken down under the pressure of an increasingly abnormal Republican Party.
