The phrase "aggressive identification" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where one is discussing assertive or forceful recognition or categorization of something or someone.
Example: "The marketing team employed aggressive identification strategies to target potential customers more effectively."
Alternatives: "forceful recognition" or "assertive categorization".
Given the rapidly rising levels of diabetes in South Asian populations, these results warrant further exploration and, if replicated, the possibility of more aggressive identification and treatment of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy in South Asian women should be explored.
The prescription increases may be partially explained by greater reliance on clinical practice guidelines, [ 8, 9] particularly more aggressive identification and management of risk factors for chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis.
A couple of residents complained that the officers tended to be rude and aggressive in demanding identification.
With early identification, aggressive physiological support, appropriate monitoring, including cEEG, and an adequate length of treatment, young trauma patients with no previous seizure history and limited structural damage to the brain can have excellent neurological recovery from prolonged RSE.
Our case demonstrates that with early identification, aggressive physiological support, appropriate monitoring, including cEEG, and an adequate length of treatment, young trauma patients with no previous seizure history and limited structural damage to the brain can have excellent neurological recovery from prolonged RSE.
This study provides new evidence in support of the potential of Ep-ICD and EpEx when incorporated with ESLI to serve as markers for identification of aggressive PTMC from non-aggressive PTMC.
These findings identify clinical settings that may warrant closer surveillance and more aggressive measures in the identification and prevention of endocarditis.
The mortality from septic shock was found to be as high as 46%% in the original EGDT control group, but the implementation of protocols aiming at early identification and aggressive care has lead to an improved survival, and nowadays the mortality from septic shock ranges between 20 and 30%% [1, 2, 11].
Undoubtedly, early identification and aggressive management are likely to improve long-term outcomes.
Identification and aggressive treatment of dehydration is critical for effective cholera treatment.
