The phrase "aggressive expansionist" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a person, organization, or country that seeks to expand its influence or territory in a forceful or assertive manner.
Example: "The company's aggressive expansionist strategy has led to rapid growth in new markets, but it has also raised concerns about its long-term sustainability."
Alternatives: "militant expansionist" or "assertive expansionist".
Washington believed that China was an aggressive, expansionist power that threatened the security of its noncommunist neighbors.
China's non-Han minorities found themselves surrounded by an aggressive, expansionist Han Chinese culture during the early Qing.
But the Japanese do not mention that in 1895 Qing China lay prostrate, defeated the previous year by an aggressive, expansionist and rapidly Westernising Japan.
Without going full Basil Fawlty, Jones was deploying the hoary trope of an aggressive, expansionist EU posing a 1940s-style toreat to a defiant United Kingdom.
The necessity for us and the Saudis in particular – as well as the Gulf states, Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE, Jordan and Egypt – is to be on our guard against Iran, which is an aggressive, expansionist power.
He went on to say he had been criticising "Benjamin Netanyahu's government and its aggressive expansionist policies", while making clear he was "of course not speaking about Jewish people".
All the talk over China's revisionism and unilateralist approach to territorial conflicts, however, tends to overlook the fact that China has hardly invaded any country since the end of Cold War, and has had a millennium of imperial history based on a benign tributary system rather than an aggressive-expansionist outlook.
Francisco Solanos Lopez's aggressively expansionist policies helped contribute to its outbreak.
There was nothing inherently pacifist about the Chinese governments' views of war, and pragmatic approaches even aggressive and expansionist projects—often prevailed.
Why do some autocratic leaders pursue aggressive or expansionist foreign policies, while others are much more cautious in their use of military force?
Given the aggressive and expansionist nature of the Iranian regime, only the naive or disingenuous would settle for these two conditions.
