The phrase "aggressive engagement" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where one is discussing assertive or forceful involvement in a situation, such as in business, politics, or social interactions.
Example: "The company's strategy for the upcoming quarter includes aggressive engagement with potential clients to boost sales."
Alternatives: "assertive involvement" or "forceful participation".
The natural third way is "aggressive engagement".
He calls it "aggressive engagement -- something between outright military engagement and useless constructive engagement".
Which is why I would also apply "aggressive engagement" -- in different ways -- to Yasir Arafat and Ariel Sharon.
In late September the U.S. government announced its intentions to pursue "aggressive engagement" with Somaliland and Puntland.
Aggressive engagement in support of triple self-determination -- for Lebanon, Iraq and the Palestinians -- would be a great way to follow up, and help consolidate, the liberation of Iraq.
Aggressive engagement of Syria also feels right to me because a U.S. attack on Syria right now would make many Iraqis feel very uncomfortable about working openly with America.
Yet as the leading Union generals in the field refused to directly engage Confederate troops, President Lincoln began to display an almost intuitive understanding of the aggressive military strategy that would win the war, a wisdom that would lead him to bring in new generals and push for more aggressive engagements in 1862.
By the second decade of the new millennium, Hollywood began distancing itself from aggressive narrative engagement with September 11.
Sports is inherently political, and the existence of the NFL as a multibillion-dollar business enterprise today is a direct result of its aggressive political engagement ― a tradition that is, in fact, older than the Super Bowl.
At its best the leave is a tangible presence, an act of decisive, aggressive non-engagement, a challenge to the bowler to blink first, go seeking a response and find yourself counterpunched by some maddening little opener's nudge, or cuff or clip.
And though they have become more transparent, more responsive, less aggressive in their engagement with the public, the impact of their core business is much the same.
