The phrase "aggressive allocation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to finance, resource management, or investment strategies where a bold or assertive approach to distributing resources is being discussed.
Example: "The company's aggressive allocation of funds into emerging markets has yielded significant returns this quarter."
Alternatives: "assertive distribution" or "bold resource allocation".
Mr. Markman wrote back, agreeing to the bet but saying that he wanted to use Aggressive Allocation this time, as well as a July 1 start.
A fairer comparison, he said, would have been the Markman Aggressive Allocation fund, an equity fund that returned 240percentt pretax during the five years.
Depending on how they invest, Morningstar will classify them as "conservative allocation," "moderate allocation," "aggressive allocation" or "world allocation" funds, all niches in the balanced-fund category.
(For those who were spending down a portfolio with this aggressive allocation, there is no salve except the hope that what they have left will continue to bounce back).
As a broad market approach, eight stocks from the Dow, 11 from the S&P and 11 from the Nasdaq would be an aggressive allocation, with two boring, three medium-risk and three higher-risk picks from the Dow, and two low-risk, five medium-risk and four higher-risk stocks in the S&P and the Nasdaq.
Add both the Netherlands (EWN) and Belgium (EWK) to your global ETF portfolios to balance more aggressive allocations to emerging market countries.
The last option -- the aggressive managed allocation option -- follows a similar approach, but with a heavier emphasis on stocks.
The new Aggressive Managed Allocation option is similar to the original age-based funds, except that more money is devoted to stocks for all age groups.
"And with almost four years of down markets, I would lean toward advising investors to have a more aggressive asset allocation".
In short, consumers have no real choice: either they switch to a less aggressive asset allocation or they lose a benefit they have been paying for.
She makes a reasonable point, though you have to wonder whether there are enough 17-year-olds and their parents for whom such an aggressive asset allocation is appropriate.
