The phrase "aggregated into five" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the process of combining or collecting data or items into five distinct groups or categories.
Example: "The survey results were aggregated into five main categories for easier analysis."
Alternatives: "combined into five" or "consolidated into five".
21 four diagnostic methods' information were aggregated into five parts and the polymerization was good.
Finally, analysing the signature elements of the initial frames, the eight initial frames were then aggregated into five final frames.
Every populated locality gets a score between 0 and 12 and these are aggregated into five categories ranging from highly accessible to very remote.
The remaining eight classifications were aggregated into five categories (cropland, forest, grassland, urban land, and water) following the level I classification scheme developed by Anderson et al. (1976).
The items are aggregated into five rationally cohesive sections: (1) Cognition and Stream of Consciousness, (2) Self-Awareness and Presence, (3) Bodily Experiences, (4) Demarcation/Transitivism, (5) Existential Reorientation.
Results of cluster analysis showed that 21 of the 23, respectively, aggregated into five kinds of syndromes/syndrome elements and enabled the identification of qi deficiency pattern, blood stasis pattern, qi stagnation pattern, yin deficiency pattern, and yang deficiency pattern.
These indicators were aggregated into four components: soil quality, cropping practices, fertilization management, and farmland management.
A direct comparison with vent frequencies in Allen et al.3 is complicated, because their results are aggregated into four large geographic regions.
Microanalytic coding of the caregiving sessions considered nine forms of maternal touch, which were aggregated into three global touch categories: affectionate, stimulating, and instrumental.
When each of the 36 g loadings and race effects were aggregated into nine four-item "subtests," the magnitude of the Jensen Effect was Spearman's ρ=.52.
Based on the extensiveness of the agricultural practices involved, the different AES types were aggregated into three categories (AESEXT+, AESEXT++ and AESEXT+++) forming a gradient of extensiveness in farming practices.
