The phrase "aggregate production" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to economics, agriculture, or manufacturing, referring to the total output of goods or services produced in a specific area or sector.
Example: "The report analyzed the trends in aggregate production over the last decade, highlighting significant growth in the technology sector."
Alternatives: "total output" or "overall production".
Mirzapour Al-e-hashem et al. (2011) proposed a multi-site, multi-period, multi-product aggregate production planning problem in a supply chain consisting of multiple suppliers, multiple plants and multiple customers under cost and demand uncertainty.
Aggregate production was determined as the product of yield by production area in each 25-km simulation unit and production at NUTS2, national, or European level was determined as the sum of production in all pixels at the respective level.
More specifically, a more realistic mixed integer nonlinear programming model is proposed to deal with multi-site, multi-product, and multi-period Aggregate Production Planning (APP) setting with different levels of drivers and different types of vehicles.
The model, therefore, consists of the inverse product market demand function in Equation (15), the aggregate production function in Equation (16), the inverse supply curve of capital in Equation (17), and the Armington aggregator in Equation (39).
One of the most widely used approaches to address this question development accounting combines measured inputs according to an aggregate production function and compares the estimated outputs to countries' observed gross domestic products (GDPs).
The aggregate production function has been displaced by the production possibility frontier.
It does not even say that the aggregate production of back-yard medicinal-marijuana gardens would "substantially affect interstate commerce".
Without adaptation, losses in aggregate production are expected for wheat, rice and maize in both temperate and tropical regions by 2 °C of local warming.
In 1966 Jorgenson took a crucial step beyond the aggregate production function employed by Robert Solow (1957) in accounting for economic growth.
Robert M. Solow (1957), "Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function," Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 39, No. 3, August, pp. 312-320.
The dynamic processes were designed to maximally represent high concentration involving aggregate production, deposition, coagulation, and transport.
