The phrase "aggregate preferences" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the collective choices or opinions of a group, often in fields like economics, data analysis, or decision-making.
Example: "The study aimed to analyze the aggregate preferences of consumers regarding sustainable products."
Alternatives: "collective preferences" or "combined preferences".
Combined with aggregate preferences for protein types, there is potential to utilize aggregation for the detection and extraction of low-concentration species.
Past research emphasizes differences in aggregate preferences due to context effects, but is incomplete in some important respects.
The methodology allows multiple decision makers to aggregate preferences for different alternatives evaluated by different decision makers in a participative fashion.
To estimate WTP researchers need to ask questions involving counterfactual prices, to specify doubtful implementation rules, and to aggregate preferences in a way that is inconsistent with political rights.
Model parameters of the most theoretically appealing specification include estimates of means (i.e., aggregate preferences for the attributes studied) and regression coefficients for the effects of latent variables on the taste sensitivities common to the decision scenarios (i.e., structure of preferences in relation to the attributes).
Peixoto says that on social networks "you can brainstorm and you can aggregate preferences".
Though Inveni's technology draws obvious parallels with Netflix and Amazon, Weber said that the two services essentially rely on an algorithm to aggregate taste preferences and serve recommendations, and Inveni differs from this — sort of.
The aims of this study are (1) to construct a hierarchy for evaluation using criteria against the UD principles, (2) to develop a convenient and effective eigenvalue algorithm for deriving the weights of criteria, and (3) to aggregate preference information and rank the order of decision alternatives by using linguistic variables associated with fuzzy weighted average techniques.
Under certain assumptions, the overall or aggregate preference ordering is compatible with EU theory.
This is mainly because the Party/State aggregates preferences poorly and the popular classes often become frustrated with existing opportunities for participation.
Let s x,s y ∈ S, where S is a set of service providers offering a particular service, then the Aggregated Preference Indices which is the weighted summation of all the service provider is given by π ( s x, s y ) = ∑ j = 1 k P j ( s x, s y ) w j π ( s y, s x ) = ∑ j = 1 k P j ( s y, s x ) w j (4).
