The phrase "aggregate of person" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct form would be "aggregate of persons" or "aggregate of people."
Example: "The study analyzed the aggregate of persons involved in the project to determine overall effectiveness."
Alternatives: "group of individuals" or "collection of people."
His theory of social interaction ("intermental activity") emphasized the individual in an aggregate of persons and brought Tarde into conflict with Émile Durkheim, who viewed society as a collective unity.
That is, one of the beings now thinking your thoughts is an aggregate of person-stages, each of which is psychologically connected with each of the others and to no other stage.
That is, one of the beings thinking your current thoughts is an aggregate of person-stages, each of which is psychologically continuous with each of the others and with no other stage.
Mill goes on to say that just as each person's own happiness is a good to that person, so too happiness, as such, is a good to the aggregate of persons.
Hence atomistic theories of institutions tend to go hand in glove with atomistic theories of all collective entities, e.g. a society consists of an aggregate of individual human persons.
Status groups are aggregates of persons arranged in a hierarchical social system.
It is commonly charged that Mill's inference commits the fallacy of composition the fallacy that since this person has a mother, that person has a mother, and that other person has a mother, therefore the aggregate of all persons has a mother.
As he puts it, since "each person's happiness is a good to that person, then 'the general happiness' must be a good to the aggregate of all persons" (Utilitarianism, Ch. 4).
Mill then continues to argue that people desire happiness — the utilitarian end — and that the general happiness is "a good to the aggregate of all persons".
He argues that a person does desire his own happiness for its own sake and that, therefore, happiness as such is desired by and desirable for its own sake for humanity as a whole ("The aggregate of all persons") (IV 3).
However, despite the importance of including covariates, a model that includes a covariate that is an aggregate of a person-level characteristic rather than a study characteristic may also produce biased results.
