aggregate limits

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "aggregate limits" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in contexts related to insurance or finance, referring to the maximum amount that can be claimed or paid out under a policy or agreement over a specified period or for a specific type of coverage. Example: "The insurance policy has aggregate limits that cap the total payout at $1 million for all claims made during the policy year."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

If defenders of aggregate limits have hope of a victory or a limited loss, it probably rests with Chief Justice Roberts.

The New York Times

"Aggregate limits combat corruption," he said.

The New York Times

If the court strikes down the aggregate limits, expect more madness to come.

The Guardian - Opinion

"These aggregate limits might not all stand or fall together," he said.

The New York Times

The existing system with aggregate limits has allowed special interests to dominate political fund-raising.

The New York Times

Instead, they contend that aggregate limits are too low and that the caps in general are simply unconstitutional.

The New York Times

Unlike product-liability sections in companies' property-and-casualty policies, which have aggregate limits, non-product liability is usually unlimited.

The Economist

Would lifting aggregate limits change the fund-raising practices of Bachus, Hensarling and other members of the House and Senate?

The New York Times

"Really?" His critics respond that the aggregate limits are an important tool to prevent circumvention of the base limits.

The New York Times

"Is there a way to eliminate that aspect while retaining some of the aggregate limits?" Ms. Murphy did not seem eager to win only half of her case.

The New York Times

Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr. responded that the aggregate limits were an important tool to prevent circumvention of the base limits.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing campaign finance, specify the time frame to which the "aggregate limits" apply (e.g., per election cycle, per year) for clarity.

Common error

Avoid assuming that "aggregate limits" are universally understood; define them, especially when writing for a general audience unfamiliar with campaign finance regulations or insurance policies.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "aggregate limits" functions as a noun phrase, typically used to describe a specific type of restriction or cap. It's often seen in the context of financial or political regulations, as shown by Ludwig, indicating a maximum total amount.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

98%

Formal & Business

1%

Science

1%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "aggregate limits" is grammatically correct and very commonly used, as supported by Ludwig's analysis. It primarily appears in news and media, referring to the total caps on contributions or payouts, especially in the context of campaign finance and insurance. Understanding the scope of "aggregate limits" is vital to avoid misinterpretations, and specify time frames when using it. Related phrases include "overall limits" and "total contribution caps". The McCutcheon v. FEC case significantly impacted federal "aggregate limits", highlighting their controversial nature concerning free speech.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

aggregate contribution restrictions

This alternative directly uses "aggregate contribution" with a small variation in the word order and adds the word restriction.

overall limits

This alternative focuses on the total or comprehensive nature of the limits.

total contribution caps

This alternative emphasizes the maximum amount of contributions allowed.

combined expenditure ceilings

This alternative highlights the maximum spending allowed in total.

maximum cumulative donations

This alternative focuses on the highest amount of donations when added together.

upper bounds on total contributions

This alternative stresses the highest permissible limits for contributions.

collective restriction on funding

This alternative points out the combined limitations placed on funding.

consolidated limits

This alternative emphasizes the consolidated or combined nature of the limits.

total amount restrictions

This alternative highlights the restrictions on the overall amounts.

capped total contributions

This alternative emphasizes the capped or limited nature of the total contributions.

FAQs

What are "aggregate limits" in campaign finance?

"Aggregate limits" refer to the total amount an individual can contribute to all candidates, political parties, and PACs in a given election cycle. These are distinct from base limits, which apply to individual recipients.

How do "aggregate limits" differ from base limits in campaign contributions?

Base limits restrict the amount a donor can give to a single candidate or committee, while "aggregate limits" cap the total amount a donor can give to all candidates and committees combined. /s/base+limits

What are some arguments for and against "aggregate limits"?

Proponents argue "aggregate limits" prevent corruption and undue influence, while opponents claim they restrict free speech and political expression. Those against could claim that /s/unconstitutional+burden exists on the First Amendment.

What was the impact of the McCutcheon v. FEC Supreme Court decision on "aggregate limits"?

The McCutcheon v. FEC decision struck down the federal "aggregate limits" on individual contributions to candidates and political committees, arguing they infringed on First Amendment rights.