Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
Table 4 Age distributions by study type and histopathology Dataset Study number Premenopausal only Study mean ages Age range Randomized trials 26 10 35.8–53.4 20–70 Prospective 38 4 20 8367.4 20–83 Retrospective 70 0 32.6–59.6 19 91 Studies with leiomyosarcomas 14 0 32.6–48.0 21–81 Leiomyosarcoma patients – – 30 63 17 ≤ 50 6 > 509 unknown.
The participants represented different ages (age range, 69 96 years).
Median ages (age range), gender distribution, Braak score and CAA score are denoted.
To examine age differences in neural responses during reward learning (even in the face of preserved responses to reward outcomes), 39 healthy adults of varying ages (age range 22 85) completed a probabilistic-learning task while undergoing fMRI.
Similar(56)
Number, mean age, age range and gender distribution of subjects in the control group and the referred group.
This resulted in a group of 1027 individuals with mean age, age range, and sex ratio identical to those in the PAMELA group.
Participants: N, mean age, age range, gender, severity of condition (e.g. number of affected vessels, left ventricular ejection fraction), inclusion and exclusion criteria, reported differences between intervention and comparison groups.
A total of 140 premenopausal female subjects, ≥18 years of age (age range 18 48 years) with VDD (25 OHD level < 20 ng/mL), were analyzed for SNPs in the CaSR gene.
It is important to stress that the rift structures that constitute the individual segments of the Ural African transcontinental oil and gas belt have different ages, ages ranging from Mesoarchean to Cenozoic.
A total of 186 lumbar vertebrae in 47 patients (mean age, 58 years; age range, 24 85 years) were analysed, 24 men (mean age, 55 years; age range, 24 85 years) and 23 women (mean age, 59 years; age range, 31 80 years).
Twenty-four patients (51%) were men (mean age, 54.8 years; age range, 24 85 years) and 23 patients were women (mean age, 59.4 years; age range, 31 83 years).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com