The phrase "agencies review" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the process by which agencies evaluate or assess something, such as a proposal, application, or policy.
Example: "The agencies review all submitted applications to ensure they meet the necessary criteria before approval."
Alternatives: "agency assessment" or "agency evaluation".
Federal agencies review the plans, but they are approved as a matter of course.
Then the city must submit an environmental impact statement, consult with the many interested federal agencies, review proposals from contractors, and choose a winning proposal.
It had been approved by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, whose members, drawn from different government agencies, review foreign investments that could have an impact on national security.
Dubai International Capital, owned by the government of the Persian Gulf emirate, said it will delay its acquisition of Doncasters Group Ltd., a British company that has nine plants in the United States, by as many as two months from March 31 while government agencies review the purchase.
The caricature drawn was that of a failed state, but that was wrong, as evidenced by a recent interim report by the standing intelligence agencies review committee, which absolved the Belgian intelligence services, the state security and the military intelligence of blame.
In relation to the incident, the 59-page report made just one recommendation: that the joint agencies review the policy around the provision of lifejackets to people "onboard vessels in distress situations where it is not possible to board the vessel and assist in the correct fitting of lifejackets".
Intelligence agencies reviewed information about the satellite launching last fall, but concluded that it warranted no action.
With many agencies reviewing thousands of documents, this process is guaranteed to take months rather than weeks.
Across the four agencies reviewed by the inspector general, investigators found "relatively few reported allegations of sexual harassment and misconduct".
Because the agencies reviewed drug research independently of RECs and research permission givers, drug trials were reviewed twice (or three times).
The inspector general suggested that the agency review the discrepancy and account for it to taxpayers.
