The phrase "age were evaluated using" is not correct in written English.
It appears to be a fragment and lacks proper subject-verb agreement, as "age" is singular and should be paired with a singular verb.
Example: "The ages of the participants were evaluated using a standardized test."
Alternatives: "ages were assessed using" or "age was analyzed using".
Material and methods: A total of 300 women between 40 and 59 years of age were evaluated using Greene scale for climacteric symptoms, Cooper questionnaire for psychosomatic symptoms of stress, Smilkstein family apgar for family dysfunction, Duke-UNC questionnaire for social support and Israel scale for vital events.
Behavioral syndromes of children at 8 years of age were evaluated using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL).
Differences in seropositivity rates by gender and age were evaluated using the Chi-square test with Yates correction.
Different placement and combinations of turning points in the development with age were evaluated using Akaike's An Information Criterion (AIC) [ 12].
In the multivariable analyses, non-linear effect of age was evaluated using a restricted cubic spline [ 17].
The pattern of development with age was evaluated using piecewise logistic regression in combination with Akaike's An Information Criterion.
The relation between peak levels and age was evaluated using bivariate Pearson correlation coefficient and the relation between protein levels measured with ELISA and SELDI-TOF MS was evaluated with using bivariate Spearman correlation coefficient.
A total of 54 participants (38 healthy controls (HC), eight with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and eight with AD) from the Australian Imaging Biomarker and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging were evaluated using standardized LP.
In order to assess the factors guiding these changes, the mouse synaptic mitochondrial proteome changes during aging were evaluated using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis, which provides comprehensive pathway and network analysis tools for 'omics data.
A total of 122 patients with hip fracture, aged 81.3 ± 6.5 years, were evaluated using the MFAC and Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS).
Twenty five RHTN patients (15 non-T2D and 10 T2D, 15 males, 10 females; age range 34 to 70 years) were evaluated using the following parameters: BMI (body mass index), biochemical analysis, serum adiponectinemia, echocardiogram and ambulatory electrocardiograph heart rate variability (HRV) in time and frequency domains stratified into three periods: 24 hour, day time and night time.
