The phrase "age of university" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in a context discussing the historical or contemporary significance of universities in society.
Example: "We are currently living in the age of university, where higher education plays a crucial role in shaping our future."
Alternatives: "era of higher education" or "time of universities".
Claims that today's college students are less able writers than their predecessors in some "Golden Age" of university instruction are legion in the discourses of college educators.
Some critics say the 40-something writers of Peep Show Jesse Armstrong and Sam Bains are out of touch with the realities of being a student in the age of university tuition fees.
In fact, from 1989 to 1999 the average age of university teachers increased by almost 10 years to 52, and it is anticipated that 30% will reach retirement by 2005.
As early-education pioneer Maria Montessori wrote, "The most important period of life is not the age of university studies, but the first one, the period from birth to the age of six".
Spouses, domestic partners, and children (under 23 years of age) of University employees and students who possess a family ID card are also granted library privileges.
The average age range of university students is 17 23 years.
Inconsistencies may be attributable with the narrow age range of university students included in some studies.
But even with their ties to industry, which are common in the age of university-corporate partnerships, the group of critics stand to gain nothing from criticizing Dr. Oz -- it's a smokescreen.
Eighteen right-handed healthy university students (4 males, age-range 18 28 years, mean age 23 years, 1 5 years of university level education) without neurological or psychiatric history (self-report) and normal or corrected-to-normal vision participated in the experiment.
The women were requested to state the date, their age, level of university education, own and parents' country of birth, sexual orientation and if they currently were in a stable relationship or not.
The IG and CG1 were compared regarding background variables (age, level of university education, immigrant background, relationship status) and reproductive history (history of STI, pregnancy, abortion, miscarriage, childbirth) with independent t-test for continuous variables, Mann–Whitney U-test for ordinal variables and Pearson's χ test for categorical variables.
