The phrase "against this interpretation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a viewpoint or argument that opposes a particular interpretation of a text, event, or situation.
Example: "The evidence presented in the report stands against this interpretation, suggesting an alternative perspective."
Alternatives: "contrary to this interpretation" or "in opposition to this interpretation".
Previous evidence against this interpretation has been contested.
Blanca Juti, Rovio's chief marketing officer, makes the company's case against this interpretation.
In arguing against this interpretation, the dissenter in the D.C. Circuit argued that the term "appropriate" inherently requires a cost-benefit analysis.
However, the new Chandra results argue against this interpretation, because the X-ray source is fainter than expected for a young star.
Against this interpretation, it could be argued that the individual mossy fibre stimuli could have successively activated different sets of granule cells4,5, and that a lack of reduced responsiveness of the Purkinje cell to the CS could reflect a lack of LTD only in a subset of synapses not involved in generating the CR.
The balance of available data is against this interpretation of transitions, though it is clear from studies of the dielectric constant that, at many transitions in molecular solids with polar molecules, the molecules acquire much greater orientational freedom on passing into the high-temperature form.
The race will almost certainly be understood through this framing, whatever the outcome.I'd like to add two points of caution against taking this interpretation too far.
Further, the students did not check this interpretation against the actual proposal.
The Oxford Condemnations were later interpreted as a campaign against Thomism (Callus 1955), but this interpretation has been challenged (Wilshire 1964).
Throughout the Dialectic Kant argued against this (constitutive) interpretation of the ideas and principles of reason, claiming that reason so far transcends possible experience that there is nothing in experience that corresponds with its ideas.
Furthermore, the fact that double cones have a very different Pn function argues against this simple interpretation.
