against terrorism

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'against terrorism' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to express opposition to or condemnation of terrorist activities or terrorism in general. For example, "This government is strongly committed to fighting against terrorism."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The war against terrorism?

The Economist

The fight is against terrorism, and terrorists.

Independent

The war against terrorism is yielding dividends.

The Economist

11 campaign against terrorism.

The New York Times

We're at war against terrorism".

The New York Times

He was fighting against terrorism.

The New York Times - Magazine

It explains methods to protect buildings against terrorism.

Effective Physical Security

The nation stands united & resolute against terrorism.

The Guardian

We are determined to fight against terrorism.

The Guardian

"We've got to stand together against terrorism.

The New York Times

Our weapon against terrorism is peace.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about terrorism, specify the context to avoid generalizations. For example, instead of just saying "against terrorism", specify "efforts against terrorism in Southeast Asia".

Common error

Avoid using "against terrorism" as a blanket statement. Provide concrete examples or actions being taken to show a nuanced understanding. Otherwise, the phrase risks sounding generic and unconvincing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "against terrorism" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase, often used adjectivally or adverbially to modify nouns or verbs. It indicates opposition or resistance to terrorist activities. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Academia

15%

Science

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "against terrorism" is a grammatically correct and very common prepositional phrase used to express opposition to terrorist activities. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and wide applicability. It is most frequently found in news and media, academic, and scientific contexts, indicating a neutral to professional register. While versatile, it's important to provide specific context when using this phrase to avoid generalizations and enhance clarity. Alternatives such as "combating terrorism" or "countering terrorism" may be more appropriate depending on the intended nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

combating terrorism

Focuses on the active process of fighting terrorism.

countering terrorism

Emphasizes actions taken to neutralize or offset terrorist activities.

fighting terrorism

Directly describes the act of engaging in conflict against terrorism.

opposing terrorism

Highlights a stance of resistance or disagreement with terrorism.

tackling terrorism

Suggests a problem-solving approach to address terrorism.

efforts to defeat terrorism

Emphasizes the actions taken with the goal of ending terrorism.

measures to prevent terrorism

Focuses on proactive steps taken to stop terrorism before it occurs.

the struggle against terrorism

Highlights the prolonged and difficult nature of resisting terrorism.

global fight against terrorism

Emphasizes the worldwide scope of the effort to combat terrorism.

international efforts against terrorism

Highlights collaborative actions by multiple countries to counter terrorism.

FAQs

How can I use "against terrorism" in a sentence?

You can use "against terrorism" to describe actions, policies, or sentiments that oppose terrorist activities. For example, "The government is implementing new measures /s/to+counter+terrorism".

What are some alternatives to "against terrorism"?

Alternatives include "combating terrorism", "countering terrorism", or "fighting terrorism", each with slightly different nuances.

Which is more appropriate, "against terrorism" or "in opposition to terrorism"?

"Against terrorism" is more direct and commonly used. "In opposition to terrorism" is more formal and emphasizes a stance of resistance.

What's the difference between "war against terrorism" and "fight against terrorism"?

"War against terrorism" implies a large-scale, often military, effort. "Fight against terrorism" is broader and can include non-military actions like intelligence gathering and law enforcement.