Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
How respondents wanted to balance quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained against benefiting those with few lifetime QALYs was quantified for a range of different cases.
Only a few studies [ 24- 26] have quantified how people trade off QALYs gained against benefiting those with the lower QALE per se, and these studies were limited in important respects.
The present study used a new, comprehensive questionnaire to assess people's support for lifetime QALY prioritarianism and to quantify how they trade off QALYs gained against benefiting those with low initial QALE.
Similar(57)
We always weigh risks against benefits.
They are constantly weighing consequences against benefits, murder against morality.
There is no right of appeal against benefit reductions.
Another is that risks have to be weighed against benefits.
Some is redirected against benefit cheats, even as unemployment rises.
So do part-time theatre workers, who are protesting against benefit changes.
Those chosen to regulate energy and tackle climate change would have weighed costs against benefits minutely.
Now, a welfare family cannot save more than $2,000 without it counting against benefits.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com