The phrase "again to accommodate" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a repeated action or effort made to meet someone's needs or preferences.
Example: "We have adjusted our schedule again to accommodate the requests of our clients."
Alternatives: "once more to meet" or "again to satisfy".
De Peyster was displaced in 1973 when Bowling Green was renovated again to accommodate subway improvements.
Then, at 4 p.m., the set was changed again to accommodate the evening performance.
It was not clear late last night if the size of the deal had grown again, to accommodate the lower price.
The exhibition at the Saatchi Gallery in London to mark 50 Years of the Sunday Times Magazine has attracted so many visitors that it is being extended again to accommodate the unprecedented demand.
The inaccessibility of the station has long been a source of frustration for subway riders; since Sept. 11, 2001, the two platforms have been open for about three years, from September 2002 to August 2005, when they closed again, to accommodate excavation and construction on the Dey Street underground concourse that will link the Fulton Street Transit Center to the World Trade Center site.
Sokratis Papastathopoulos: Harry Kane is back and Spurs are having to find their rhythm again to accommodate him.
The woman turned her cow around and drove it back home again just to accommodate me.
He could move to right-back again today to accommodate David Luiz against a City team who produced a stunning performance at the Bridge last February, coming from 1-0 down to win 4-2, infliChelseahelsea's first home defeat for 15 months and what could have been fatal damage to their championship aspirations.
God's House Tower was built to defend the southern quays around 1417 and the sluices that controlled the level of the town's moats, and equipped with numerous gunports rooftop firing points, and by 1439 Catchcold tower had also been constructed, again designed to accommodate gunpowder weapons.
The current version of the Act, passed in 2008, incorporates a number of very significant amendments, which were again made to accommodate rapid advances in science as well as changes in public attitudes and clinical practice (Lovell-Badge, 2008).
It was downgraded again shortly afterwards to accommodate the poorly rated assessment of its work in the area of cultural services.
