The phrase "again the class of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a previously mentioned category or group in a repeated context.
Example: "Again the class of mammals demonstrates remarkable adaptability in various environments."
Alternatives: "once more the category of" or "revisiting the group of".
And once again the Class of '92 proved its dominance, winning in one minute, 12.5 seconds.
While the game against Toronto ended in a 2-2 draw, it's clear that the Galaxy are once again the class of MLS.
Time and time again, the Class of 2018 has demonstrated that although we may be a new generation, we are not too young to speak up, to dream, and to create tangible, positive change.
New Orleans looks again like the class of the conference, but surprise Super Bowl winners are sometimes too satisfied to recapture the necessary resolve.
So, congratulations again to the Class of 2017.
And I might once again embarrass the Class of 1970.
Again, as the class of uniformly G3-Lipschitzian semigroups is larger than the class of uniformly G2-Lipschitzian semigroups, therefore using Theorem 3.2, one immediately derives the following result due to Soliman [9].
Boise State should again be the class of the Group of Five leagues this year and will be the prohibitive favorite to earn the automatic bid to a major bowl game.
Premiership leaders Quins took time to impose themselves on an admirably committed Connacht side but in the end the power of their pack, in which England discard Nick Easter was again outstanding, and the class of their backs ensured they ran out easy winners.
"It's going to be a long day - the performance today was very good and very special". When asked are Force India "redefining what's possible" he says: "We're not thinking that, we're still the same team, but there's still a long time to go". Russell Poulter Hamiltonn showing once again he's the class of the field.
When we met again, the class seemed universally doubtful of Smith's visions, a few even calling him "crazy" or "deceitful," but after I pointed out that none of them, even those who had doubted the account in Acts, had used such language to describe Saul, they recognized how their critical assessment of the text had instead become a moralizing judgment about the credibility of Mormonism.
