Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Proof Assume again that there exists a t 1 ≥ t 0 such that x ( t ) > 0 for t ≥ t 1.
Similar(59)
From the previous theorem, we see again that there exist several cases where we can control a solution to Problem P through the source term (-Phi F).
Our finding implies that the methylation might occur in the nearby CpG sites for the negative T-DMRs, while the methylation in the positive T-DMRs is likely to occur directly on the TF binding sites, suggesting again that there exist different regulatory mechanisms for positive and negative T-DMRs.
Suppose that there exists, (2.109).
Again, assume that there exists m ∈ N such that 1 2 d ( x m, T x m ) ≥ d ( x m, x ∗ ) and 1 2 d ( T x m, T 2 x m ) ≥ d ( T x m, x ∗ ).
Again, we deduce that there exists a constant (K_{1.1}>0) with sup_{x geq0} F_{1}(x) leq K_{1.1}.
Again, we deduce that there exists a constant (K_{1.1}>0) with sup_{x geq0} B_{1}(x) leq K_{1.1}.
(2.15) Then, by using the Lagrange mean value theorem again, we have that there exists ϑ, (y^
Furthermore, it has again been shown that there exists ongoing mortality in ARF patients following their discharge from the ICU.
Proof We assume again on the contrary that there exists τ n ≥ 0 and a sequence u n with ∥ u n ∥ > 0 and u n → 0 in P C [ 0, 1 ], such that Φ λ ( u n ) = τ n φ ˜ 0 for all n ∈ N. Then u n = A λ ( u n ) + τ n φ ˜ 0, and we conclude from Remark 2.2 that u n > 0 in [ 0, 1 ].
We again found that there existed vertices in the MI graph that had degree that were (statistically) significantly higher than the surrogate graphs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com