again more

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "again more" is not correct and is not typically used in written English.
It seems to be an attempt to express an increase or repetition, but it lacks clarity and proper structure. Example: "We need to discuss this issue again more thoroughly."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Again, more to come.

The New York Times

So again, more plane time.

The New York Times

He tried again, more forcefully.

The New Yorker

The kid will look again, more carefully.

The New Yorker

"No," she tried again, more emphatically.

The Guardian

Then they sang them again, more confidently.

The New York Times

The flow reversed again more recently.

The New York Times

Again, more in a day or (more likely) two.

The New York Times

The boy chose again, more quickly this time.

The New Yorker

He yelled at her again, more strenuously, to back up.

The New York Times - Magazine

Another: "Can we make 'Never again' more than a promise?

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "again more" in formal writing. Opt for grammatically correct alternatives like "once more" or "repeatedly" to maintain clarity and credibility.

Common error

While "again more" appears in various sources, it's not considered standard English. Relying on such phrases can weaken your writing and create ambiguity. Consider the context and choose a more precise and grammatically sound alternative.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "again more" functions as an attempt to express repetition or increase, but its non-standard structure makes it grammatically suspect. Ludwig AI flags it as incorrect, suggesting that more precise alternatives are preferable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

49%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

18%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "again more" is frequently used but is considered grammatically incorrect by Ludwig AI. While it appears in various sources, including news and media outlets, it's advisable to avoid it in formal writing. Opt for alternatives such as "once more", "again", "furthermore", or "in addition" to maintain clarity and grammatical correctness. Though prevalent, "again more" lacks the precision and credibility of standard English phrasing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

once more

Replaces "again" and emphasizes the repeated nature of the action.

once again

Similar to "once more", but with a slightly different emphasis on resumption.

repeatedly

Highlights the recurring nature of the action or situation.

yet again

Emphasizes the frustration or surprise associated with repeated actions.

over and over

Conveys a sense of continuous repetition, often with a negative connotation.

moreover

Introduces additional information that reinforces a previous point.

time and again

Similar to "over and over", but can also indicate a predictable pattern.

furthermore

Like "moreover", adds information to support a prior statement.

additionally

A more formal synonym for "in addition".

in addition

Offers a simpler way to introduce supplementary details.

FAQs

Is the phrase "again more" grammatically correct?

No, the phrase "again more" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. It's better to use phrases like "once more" or "repeatedly".

What can I say instead of "again more"?

You can use alternatives like "once again", "furthermore", or "in addition" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "again more" or "once more"?

"Once more" is the correct and preferred option. "Again more" is not standard English.

What's the difference between "again more" and "even more"?

"Even more" implies a greater degree or intensity, while "again more" is an attempt (usually incorrect) to convey repetition or addition. "Even more" is a standard phrase, while "again more" isn't.