The phrase "again in principle" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a concept or idea that is being revisited or reaffirmed in a theoretical context.
Example: "While we have made progress, we must consider the proposal again in principle before moving forward."
Alternatives: "once more in theory" or "reaffirm in principle".
When they demanded this information from us, I began to understand that, in general, the Kremlin does not quite understand what is happening in Chechnya and, again, in principle, they do not believe the facts of the anti-gay campaign.
Again, in principle, the influence of both fixed and random effects may vary according to the level k.
Again, in principle, columns 7 and 8 should match, and indeed these results for IP admissions are more similar than the corresponding data for OP visits (columns 3 and 4).
Again, decision making should in principle be possible for large enough population sizes.
Certainly, this is possible (and once again I am in principle open to this possibility), but, as with the nucleus, there is to my knowledge no evidence that can be used to support such a contention.
Again, the only exception, in principle, is the inductor.
In principle, again, the FIR may result from a statement by a complainant.
Section 3 asked reviewers to rate the feasibility and usefulness of 10 proposed OER selection criteria based upon Merrill's first principles of instruction and application strategies for each principle, again in terms of their own teaching and learning (using a scale from one to five, with 5 being the most useful).
However, our work again suggests that adaptation is in principle an important factor in understanding how medical images – or indeed any images – are perceived and could potentially impact decisions based on these perceptions.
This again is an issue that, in principle, can be encountered in all types of medical studies, but affects microarray studies more drastically.
And these impressions have been left, we fear, at what may ultimately prove to be substantial cost to the government's credibility before the courts, to whom it will one day need to argue again in support of a principle of assertedly like importance and necessity to the one that it seems to abandon today.
