Next stop will be selling the student loan book – again bringing forward funds that will need to be repaid at a later date.
Therefore, these results have been brought forward again in the present paper.
The guide to parliamentary procedure, known as Erskine May, suggests a question "may not be brought forward again during the same [Commons] session".
Page 397 of the document states that a motion or amendment "which is the same, in substance" as something already voted on should not be brought forward again in a session of parliament.
Quoting from the guide to parliamentary procedure, Erskine May, Bercow said by convention, the question "may not be brought forward again during the same session" and that it was a "strong and longstanding convention" dating back to 1604.
In his ruling, Bercow quoted from the guide to parliamentary procedure that a question "may not be brought forward again during the same session" and that it was a "strong and long-standing convention" dating back to 1604.
In his ruling, about which the prime minister's office has said it was not forewarned, Bercow quoted from a guide to parliamentary procedure that said a question that "has been decided during a session may not be brought forward again during that same session". He said this is a "strong and long-standing convention" dating to 1604.
Here is the relevant commandment from Erskine May aka the parliamentary bible: "A motion or an amendment which is the same, in substance, as a question which has been decided during a session, may not be brought forward again during that same session". So, how can the government get round this rather large obstacle and get another vote on Theresa May's deal?
It notes that the parliamentary rulebook, Erskine May, "states that a motion or an amendment which is the same, in substance, as a question which has been decided in the affirmative or negative during the current session may not be brought forward again during that session".
