Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "afterwards data not shown" is not correct in standard written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that data was not presented after a certain point in a report or study.
Example: "The results were promising; however, afterwards data not shown limits our understanding of the full impact."
Alternatives: "subsequent data not presented" or "following data not displayed".
Exact(2)
Also adjustment for creatinine as a marker of renal function and for alcohol comsumption was done afterwards (data not shown).
An interview with both interactants afterwards (data not shown) suggested that some areas of shared understanding were reached: the patient's fear of the injection, the positive impact of a previous injection and agreement to proceed today.
Similar(58)
All sera obtained from DPI 5 or afterwards were seropositive (data not shown).
Production of Mro APO started on day 12 of fermentation and reached the maximum of 25,000 U L-1 (280 mg L-1) on day 24 (data not shown); immediately afterwards, the culture liquid of the bioreactors was harvested and used for enzyme purification studies.
The 10 best clones were again tested for PAM mRNA expression (data not shown), and afterwards the best three of these 10 clones were transfected with a plasmid containing the mAb expression cassette, in duplicates, and evaluated by CEX (using the same procedure as described for the plasmid DNA transfections).
Wild-type, ndc80 loop-region, and spc24-1 mutants established a bipolar spindle at the end of S phase (data not shown), and wild-type cells showed separation of sister CEN5s immediately afterwards, indicative of sister CEN5 biorientation on the spindle [ 17, 18].
Afterwards, 3D-cultured HMECs predominantly generated spheres, suggesting a loss of regenerative, but not proliferative, capacity (data not shown).
p.i (data not shown).
(Data not shown).
SLS showed similar results (data not shown).
However, dystrophin was not (data not shown).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com