Exact(12)
N = 12 pupils submitted both "before" and "after" questionnaires Question Increases Decreases Increases proportion Decreases proportion Most changes were improvements?
Hard-copy, paired, "before" (prior to the use of the computers) and "after" questionnaires were used for pupils and school staff, involving questions on a 1 5 Likert scale for self-assessment of attitudes and free text (Table 1; Additional file 3).
McNemar's test was used to compare the proportion of specific answers in paired data, that is, the results of the "before" and "after" questionnaires for each respondent.
After questionnaires are completed, the second step is cross-checking the answers.
On the before and after questionnaires, subjects were asked to rate the candidates on the kind of 0-10 thermometer scale frequently used in polling, ranging from "very unfavorable" to "very favorable".
The results were compiled after questionnaires, inserted in the magazine and posted online, were returned by readers who rated foreign islands on six criteria: scenery, beaches, value for money, food, places to stay and the local people.
Similar(48)
The respondents answered Sections 2 and 3 twice, before and after the education program (referred to as the "before" questionnaire and "after" questionnaire, respectively).
In total, 2,690 of the 5,000 individuals completed the "before" questionnaire, and 2,465 completed the "after" questionnaire after viewing the education program.
For six items--1, 4, 5, 8, 12, and 14--the rates of correct answers on the "after" questionnaire were significantly higher than those on the "before" questionnaire.
The evaluation used before-and-after questionnaires with parents/guardians and two after-intervention focus groups with nursing aides and trained nurses to assess the effect of the intervention.
Assessment outcomes indicated that students learned content in both subjects, with mean improvement of paired samples on the before-and-after questionnaire of 40.2%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com